SoulSort PORTAL

High-trust events need a crowd that knows how to vibe.

Set the tone upfront & know what kind of crowd is stepping through your door.

Not another survey - next-gen onboarding based on drag physics

PORTAL reads how attendees move: Where you drag, how long you wait, where you hover, where you land.

We are under-utilizing the pre-game: community mindset is a muscle that can be trained. PORTAL points out reflexes, blind-spots and nudges towards personal growth.

Participant profile — yours only

High-trust spaces carry high stakes — SoulSort solves the problem of a dead house-rules check-box.

Before

I have read the rules ☑

Passive check-box. No rehearsal. Limited signal back to the org.

After PORTAL

Active walk-through of real scenarios

Attendees arrive with a profile. Organizers get completion + anonymous crowd shape.

Feedback is how we evolve: SoulSort shows you where you are at, both as a participant and as an organizer.

Organizers see the crowd — never an individual's answers. No identification. No biometrics. No device fingerprinting.

Organizer dashboard — the crowd, never an individual

Where the crowd went

Average portal pull — Power, Desire, Community, Safety.

Community — looking after others, holding the group29%

Observation

Community is running high.

Could mean

A crowd that self-governs well and holds each other; your job is lighter here.

Try

Let the door lean on that — 'look after each other' lands with a crowd already wired for it.

Anonymous landing heatmap — portal pull across Power, Desire, Community, Safety.

How they show up

Bar width = share of landings in that portal.

Boundaries47% · Power-led

Boundariesmoments where a line gets tested or crossed

Intimacy32% · Power-led

Intimacymoments of closeness, wanting, sex/connection

Play47% · Power-led

Playmoments of fun, dancing, silliness, expression

The Work37% · Community-led

The Worklooking after each other and yourself (crisis, comedown, care)

Category pulls across boundaries, intimacy, play, and the work.

Reading the room

Observation

The game has specific consent scenarios. This crowd leaned room-first (taking care of others) — expect overall considerate attendees.

Could mean

strong collective instincts; the door can be light.

Try

name the 1–2 challenges (below) anyway — a light reminder still helps.

Across 126 room-attuned choices, the crowd leaned toward the room.

you firstroom first
Crowd is good atpartner goes still - nervous laugh - the repair
Crowd is weak atthe dancefloor push - your own limit

Consent scenarios — room-first vs you-first, strengths and gaps.

Privacy & ethics

  • No PII alongside gameplay — anonymous codes only
  • Organizers see completion + anonymous aggregate, never your answers
  • Deletion on request — consent-forward by design
  • GDPR & EU AI Act conscious architecture
  • Not biometric. Not surveillance.
  • Deterministic scoring — no generative AI on your play

Read the full privacy statement →

For organizers

Replace the manual form and dead checkbox. Receive a better-prepared, more consent-aware crowd. Get aggregate insight that helps you program and brief staff. Designed to integrate with your existing membership or RSVP flow — completion signals via API, embeddable when you're ready.